On November 18, two prominent sports wagering and fantasy sports operators announced that they are leaving the American Gaming Association (AGA). The AGA is the leading trade group for casinos, gaming manufacturers, and sportsbooks. The split follows the AGA’s recent announcement of its firm stance against “prediction markets” and a forthcoming resolution to exclude companies that offer them. Prediction markets include platforms that allow individuals to trade on the outcomes of future events — whether sports-related or not.

The operators’ departures are tied to the AGA’s position that companies entering the prediction market space are doing so to bypass state regulation of sports wagering, including in states where sports wagering is otherwise prohibited. In announcing the split, AGA stated that it wishes the departing operators the best and that it expects “to maintain close ties to [its] mission to promote and protect legal, regulated gaming.”

The AGA’s announcement and the operator’s subsequent move have the potential to reshape industry alliances. For many years, licensed operators have presented a united front opposing what they characterize as forms of unlicensed gaming, including sweepstakes casinos, offshore sportsbooks, and skill games. These sports wagering operators’ departure from the AGA may suggest that the alliance is unraveling. Participants in the gaming industry and regulators will be closely watching as this realignment plays out.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Stephen C. Piepgrass Stephen C. Piepgrass

Stephen leads the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement (RISE) Practice Group. He focuses his practice on enforcement actions, investigations, and litigation. Stephen primarily represents clients engaging with, or being investigated by, state attorneys general and other state or local governmental enforcement bodies,

Stephen leads the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement (RISE) Practice Group. He focuses his practice on enforcement actions, investigations, and litigation. Stephen primarily represents clients engaging with, or being investigated by, state attorneys general and other state or local governmental enforcement bodies, including the CFPB and FTC, as well as clients involved with litigation, with a particular focus on heavily regulated industries. He also has experience advising clients on data and privacy issues, including handling complex investigations into data incidents by state attorneys general other state and federal regulators. Additionally, Stephen provides strategic counsel to Troutman Pepper’s Strategies clients who need assistance with public policy, advocacy, and government relations strategies.

Photo of Ayana Brown Ayana Brown

Ayana represents clients in litigation and government investigations. She is experienced representing both corporate and individual clients in complex legal matters, including those involving the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Her practice spans multiple industries, such as…

Ayana represents clients in litigation and government investigations. She is experienced representing both corporate and individual clients in complex legal matters, including those involving the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Her practice spans multiple industries, such as financial services, health care, and energy.