On January 12, Massachusetts Attorney General (AG) Andrea Joy Campbell announced a settlement with Grubhub Holdings Inc. and Grubhub, Inc., (Grubhub) for allegedly repeatedly violating a statutory limit on the fees that third-party delivery companies could charge during the COVID-19 state of emergency.
North Carolina Attorney General (AG) Josh Stein led a bipartisan effort urging the federal government to impose stricter regulations on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in telemarketing. The collective push involved 26 state AGs who jointly submitted a letter in response to the Federal Communication Commission (FCC’s) Notice of Inquiry (NOI) for “Implications of Artificial Intelligence Technologies on Protecting Consumers from Unwanted Robocalls and Robotexts. The FCC’s NOI furthers efforts by the Federal Government to better understand the impact of emerging AI technologies as it aims to protect consumers from unwanted and illegal telephone calls and text messages, as stipulated under Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).”
On January 15, Washington Attorney General (AG) Bob Ferguson filed a complaint in King County Superior Court, seeking to block the merger of The Kroger Co. (Kroger) with its supermarket competitor, Albertsons Companies, Inc. (Albertsons).
This year, several state legislatures will consider bills to establish vapor product directories. Amid heightened scrutiny of illicit vapor products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), these product directory bills would create a mechanism for states to bar the sale of products that are not FDA-authorized or subject to a pending premarket application. Like state cigarette directories implemented in connection with the tobacco Master Settlement Agreement, these directories would specify which vapor products are permitted to be sold in the state.
Illinois Attorney General (AG) Kwame Raoul recently issued a consumer alert to Illinois consumers regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) by phone scammers. According to the alert, phone scammers are regularly employing AI technology to mimic the voice of consumers’ loved ones to manipulate consumers into giving financial payments.
While the federal government’s campaign against hidden “junk” fees intensifies, state attorneys general (AGs) have long been contesting concealed costs as unfair or deceptive — especially in the absence of sufficient disclosures. Energized by a surge in enforcement activity targeting junk fees, Massachusetts AG Andrea Campbell proposed new regulations aimed at prohibiting “junk fees” in Massachusetts. The term “junk fees” generally refers to additional charges imposed on consumers that are often unrelated to the actual cost of goods or services such as processing fees, convenience charges, or mandatory resort fees. Sometimes “junk fees” can also refer to a practice called “drip pricing” where a company advertises an initial low price to attract consumers but gradually reveals additional mandatory fees during the booking or purchasing process, providing the consumer with a false impression of the true cost.
On November 28, Massachusetts Attorney General (AG) Campbell reached an $8.75 million settlement with Rent-A-Center (RAC), the nation’s largest rent-to-own company specializing in consumer goods leases. The settlement aimed to resolve allegations that the company engaged in a pattern of unfair and deceptive practices against consumers in violation of Massachusetts consumer protection laws.
Oregon Attorney General (AG) Ellen Rosenblum is taking over the helm of a crucial national organization that supports the important work of AGs across America. Rosenblum was recently elected president of the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG), a nonpartisan group that serves as a forum for collaboration and resource-sharing among the states’ top legal officers.
On the heels of its recent lawsuit filed against MC Solar, Florida Attorney General (AG) Ashley Moody filed two additional lawsuits against Vision Solar and SetUp My Solar for allegedly deceiving Floridians in violation of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. The lawsuits follow Moody’s investigations into the companies, which allegedly revealed that the companies misled consumers about solar panel system installation processes, pricing, and incentives, and caused property damage.