Ashley L. Taylor Jr., co-leader of Troutman Pepper Locke’s State Attorneys General Practice Group, appeared in the September–October 2026 issue of The Journal of Federal Agency Action for his article, “State Attorneys General Will Dominate Post-Chevron Litigation.” The article was co-authored with Paul Nolette, a professor at Marquette University, and Aaron M. Frey, the attorney general of Maine.
This article was originally published on Reuters and Westlaw and is republished here with permission as it originally appeared on July 27, 2026.
Newsfeeds are saturated with dramatic headlines about artificial intelligence (“AI”) — self-driving cars, AI-generated art, hallucinated legal briefs, and predictions of technological dystopia. The constant noise can obscure a more practical reality: Artificial intelligence is, at its core, a tool. However, it does not relieve companies of their longstanding obligations to treat consumers fairly or comply with existing state law.
Clayton Friedman, Ashley L. Taylor, Jr., Namrata Kang, and Kyara Rivera Rivera, of the firm’s State Attorneys General practice, were published in the July 22, 2026, Bloomberg Law for their article, “States Are Cracking Down on Algorithmic Pricing. Are You Ready?“
Published in Law360 on July 10, 2026. © Copyright 2026, Portfolio Media, Inc., publisher of Law360. Reprinted here with permission.
For the recipient of a subpoena from a state attorney general or other state regulator, the prospect of successfully blocking the subpoena through litigation can seem dim.
In this episode of Regulatory Oversight’s “AI State Regulatory Frontiers” series, co-host Ashley Taylor is joined by colleagues Gene Fishel and Dan Waltz to examine how AI is reshaping expectations for attorneys, clients, and regulators. The discussion focuses on the emerging contours of privilege, work product, and ethics in an era where both attorneys and pro se litigants increasingly rely on AI tools. Using recent federal decisions as case studies, the episode explores how courts are beginning to draw lines around confidentiality, reasonable expectations of privacy, and the proper role of AI in legal work. The conversation then broadens to the growing patchwork of state bar opinions, court rules, and state regulatory activity on AI, and what that means for law firms and in-house counsel. Gene and Dan offer practical guidance on AI governance, platform selection, client counseling, and how to integrate AI into legal and corporate workflows in a way that is defensible, ethical, and aligned with evolving regulatory expectations.
Ashley L. Taylor, Jr., co-leader of Troutman Pepper Locke’s State Attorneys General Practice Group, was quoted in the May 5, 2026, Law360 article, “High Court Clarity On Subpoenas Creates Murky Path For AGs.”
In this episode of Regulatory Oversight, host Ashley Taylor continues the multipart series on artificial intelligence with colleagues Ghillaine Reid, David Stauss, and Matt Berns for a practical look at how states are actually regulating AI in 2025-26. Framed through a consumer protection lens, the discussion moves beyond theoretical federal proposals to real bills and regulations moving through state legislatures today.
In this episode of Regulatory Oversight, host Ashley Taylor continues his multipart series on artificial intelligence (AI) with returning guests Gurkan Ay and Andrew Coles of Resolution Economics. Together, they move beyond headlines and hypotheticals to focus on how AI is being regulated today — and what companies should be doing now to manage risk.
This article was originally published in Reuters on April 15, 2026 and republished here with permission. Also published in Westlaw Today.
“Junk fees” have become a central political and regulatory buzzword in recent years. The term generally refers to extra charges tacked onto purchases — such as convenience, service, resort, or handling fees — that are either not disclosed, or not clearly disclosed, in the initial advertised price. These charges often only appear late in the transaction process, a pricing tactic commonly known as “drip pricing.”
In this episode of Regulatory Oversight, co-host Ashley Taylor, co-leader of Troutman Pepper Locke’s State Attorneys General team, kicks off a multipart series on artificial intelligence (AI) with guests Gurkan Ay and Andrew Coles of Resolution Economics. They unpack what people really mean by “AI” today and why it is critical for risk, compliance, and legal exposure to distinguish among the three primary “flavors” of AI: predictive, generative, and agentic. In practical terms, they explain how predictive tools that score, rank, and classify individuals rely on historical data, how generative AI enables natural-language interaction but introduces risks like hallucinations, and how emerging agentic AI can autonomously plan and execute complex, multistep workflows, creating new governance challenges.