Feature Posts

Subscribe to Feature Posts via RSS

feature posts for main page slider

In Sztrom v. SEC, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia confirmed that the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in SEC v. Jarkesy, which curtailed the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) ability to seek civil penalties in its administrative forum, does not eliminate the agency’s long-standing ability to pursue industry bars through administrative follow-on proceedings. The opinion underscores that, even after Jarkesy and other recent limits on agency power, the SEC may still use its in-house process to determine whether to bar previously enjoined defendants from the securities industry, with independent review limited to the courts of appeals.

Washington, D.C. and Atlanta – March 2026 – Troutman Strategies (Strategies) and Troutman Pepper Locke’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement (RISE) team announced the addition of three professionals who deepen the firm’s federal, state, and regulatory capabilities: Jason A. Smith with the RISE team in Washington, D.C. and New York, Audra Hill as state affairs coordinator in Georgia, and Brian Mann as a government affairs specialist on the federal team in Washington, D.C.

On December 17, New Jersey announced its adoption of what its Attorney General is calling the “most comprehensive state-level disparate impact regulations in the country.” Effective December 15, 2025, the Division on Civil Rights’ (DCR) new rules under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) codify guidance on disparate impact discrimination across housing, lending, employment, places of public accommodation, and contracting.

AUSTIN – Robert Miller, principal at Troutman Strategies, has been named to USLege’s Lobby Legends of the Year list for 2025. The list recognizes individuals who have demonstrated consistent influence and credibility across multiple legislative sessions, possess deep institutional knowledge, and maintain trusted relationships across the political spectrum. Additionally, honorees are acknowledged for their role in mentoring and elevating the next generation of Texas lobbyists.

This article was originally published on August 4, 2025 on Law360 and is republished here with permission.

As the federal government pursues a deregulatory agenda, state regulators are increasing their enforcement activities to fill perceived gaps in oversight. They pursue their own regulatory agendas under state regulatory regimes that are often less developed than similar federal laws. This lack of existing state-level precedent opens the door for states to employ novel and aggressive legal theories that increase risk and uncertainty for private actors. Businesses should respond by evaluating opportunities to leverage the more comprehensive body of federal law as persuasive authority for previously unresolved questions of state law.

In Part Two of this FAQ series, we continue to break down Virginia’s Senate Bill 754, Consumer Protection Act; prohibited practices, etc., reproductive or sexual health information (Act), which amends the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (VCPA). The law went into effect on July 1, 2025.

State attorneys general (AGs) continue to play a pivotal role as innovators, shaping the regulatory environment by leveraging their expertise and resources to influence policy and practice. The public-facing nature of AG offices across the U.S. compels them to respond to constituent concerns on abbreviated timetables. This political sensitivity, combined with the AGs’ authority to address both local and national issues, underscores their significant influence in the current regulatory environment.