Photo of Barry Boise

Barry’s primary emphasis is the counseling and defense of pharmaceutical and medical device companies from early stage through marketed products. He has substantial experience litigating multidistrict litigation and coordinated state court litigation. Barry represents life science, health care, and technology companies in attorney general investigations and litigation, and in other civil and criminal actions involving health care fraud and abuse.

In this episode of our special 12 Days of Regulatory Insights podcast series, Chris Carlson, a partner in our RISE practice group and member of the State Attorney General (AG) team, is joined by colleagues Lauren Fincher, also a partner in our RISE practice and State AG team, and Barry Boise, a partner in our Health Care + Life Sciences Litigation practice, to examine how state AGs approached the health care sector in 2025, and what’s coming next in 2026.

Register Here
Tuesday, December 16 • 1:00 – 3:10 p.m. ET

Ashley Taylor, co-leader of the firm’s State Attorneys General (AG) team, and Barry Boise, a partner in the Health Care and Life Sciences Litigation practice and a member of the firm’s State AG team, will participate in an upcoming CLE webinar with myLawCLE. They will discuss how regulatory environments evolve, how enforcement priorities shift, and the importance of understanding the future trajectory of state AG litigation.

What Happened:

A unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit revived a suit against certain pharmaceutical distributors brought under West Virginia public nuisance law. The panel held that the effects of over-distributing prescription opioids may constitute a public nuisance under West Virginia law, defined distributors’ duties under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), and held that abatement may include monetary funding to remediate alleged community harm. Notably, the Fourth Circuit’s decision comes after the West Virginia Supreme Court declined to determine the scope of West Virginia public nuisance law, and as a result, the decision refused to limit the scope of public nuisance law without guidance from the West Virginia Supreme Court.

In the third episode of our special 12 Days of Regulatory Insights podcast series, Chris Carlson is joined by Barry Boise, a seasoned partner in Troutman Pepper’s Health Sciences Litigation practice group, to explore the increasing oversight of the health care industry by state attorneys generals (AGs) in 2024 and what to anticipate in 2025.

A bipartisan coalition of 23 state attorney generals led by Virginia AG Jason Miyares recently went up in arms about a products liability ruling they believe will threaten state consumer protection laws. On May 30, the coalition filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs’ claims in In Re: Fosamax (Alendronate Sodium) Products Liability Litigation, a consolidated case where hundreds of plaintiffs claimed to suffer femur fractures as a result of taking Merck drug Fosamax.

AI continues to capture the headlines. One recent headline noted that ChatGPT passed the medical boards. In this third episode, Stephen Piepgrass and colleagues Michael Yaghi and Barry Boise discuss the potential risks health care companies may face with increased reliance on AI, as well as the increased focus on AI by various regulators and state attorneys general, particularly in the health care space.